Contents Information Events and Results Gymnasts Archive
Contents Archive Archive

Message board

Welcome to the new RSG.net message board! Please behave!
Please remember, that the message board is not responsible for the opinions expressed by its members.
Also don't insult, blame, accuse, discriminate, or debase other people here.
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

2009-2012 COP balances
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Rhythmic Gymnastics Forum Index » Code of Points
View previous topic | View next topic  
Author Message
Anna Kull



Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Posts: 5153
Location: Switzerland

PostPosted: Sat, 20-Dec-2008 8:45    Post subject: 2009-2012 COP balances Reply with quote

Here is the topic for balances
_________________
RG is the true reason to go on in my life!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
cidlover



Joined: 07 Dec 2008
Posts: 862
Location: USA

PostPosted: Thu, 22-Jan-2009 0:17    Post subject: Reply with quote

For Anna Bessonova's clubs start:

Base: Side Split: .2
Without help: +.1
360 degree slow turn: +.4
Totat: 0.7

This is just for the balance. Is this correct?
_________________
I have a gymnastics blog again. Here we go. toomanyamanars.blogspot.com


Last edited by cidlover on Thu, 22-Jan-2009 3:36; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tahnee
RSG.net Moderator
RSG.net Moderator


Joined: 11 Jan 2004
Posts: 3296
Location: Perth, Australia

PostPosted: Thu, 22-Jan-2009 0:40    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think in the new COP this could be even counted as 3 balances (unheld side split, unheld side split slow turn 360, and unheld timochenko balance), since the Belova balance is no longer in the COP - not that I can see anyway. Although the first two are the same shape, so she could not have both...
_________________
http://www.youtube.com/Tahnee2612
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Invisible Hedgehog



Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Posts: 1718
Location: Ukraine, Kyiv

PostPosted: Sat, 24-Jan-2009 19:05    Post subject: Reply with quote

Belova's balance is NO longer in the COP so the last position (side flexibility) counts only for D2 for flexibility (in fact this type of work is no longer evaluated for D2 so there is no sense to do what Bessonova does in the last position).

so what she does is only side split + tourlent. Which means 0.30 + 0.40 = 0.70
_________________
Ridentem dicere verum quid vetat
check - http://www.ukraine-rg.com !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Tahnee
RSG.net Moderator
RSG.net Moderator


Joined: 11 Jan 2004
Posts: 3296
Location: Perth, Australia

PostPosted: Sun, 25-Jan-2009 1:00    Post subject: Reply with quote

But could that third position, the unheld timochenko balance she goes into as the second part of the Belova balance, be counted for difficulty, as the 0.6?
_________________
http://www.youtube.com/Tahnee2612
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
CoCoNuTsiopatHic



Joined: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 819

PostPosted: Sun, 25-Jan-2009 5:23    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tahnee wrote:
But could that third position, the unheld timochenko balance she goes into as the second part of the Belova balance, be counted for difficulty, as the 0.6?


Bessonova always did it on flat foot, though, since that was all the Code of Points asked for. Kapranova would keep her foot on the toe, however.
_________________
*Elegance is an attitude.*
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Tahnee
RSG.net Moderator
RSG.net Moderator


Joined: 11 Jan 2004
Posts: 3296
Location: Perth, Australia

PostPosted: Sun, 25-Jan-2009 9:06    Post subject: Reply with quote

CoCoNuTsiopatHic wrote:
Tahnee wrote:
But could that third position, the unheld timochenko balance she goes into as the second part of the Belova balance, be counted for difficulty, as the 0.6?


Bessonova always did it on flat foot, though, since that was all the Code of Points asked for. Kapranova would keep her foot on the toe, however.


Well in Kapranova's case, then there would be 2 separate balances..
_________________
http://www.youtube.com/Tahnee2612
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Invisible Hedgehog



Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Posts: 1718
Location: Ukraine, Kyiv

PostPosted: Sun, 25-Jan-2009 9:52    Post subject: Reply with quote

yes it could be a separate balance if ONLY Kapranova did D2 in that balance which she never did.
_________________
Ridentem dicere verum quid vetat
check - http://www.ukraine-rg.com !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Tahnee
RSG.net Moderator
RSG.net Moderator


Joined: 11 Jan 2004
Posts: 3296
Location: Perth, Australia

PostPosted: Sun, 25-Jan-2009 10:55    Post subject: Reply with quote

Invisible Hedgehog wrote:
yes it could be a separate balance if ONLY Kapranova did D2 in that balance which she never did.


Obviously, yes...
_________________
http://www.youtube.com/Tahnee2612
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
gabrielafs



Joined: 18 Oct 2008
Posts: 169
Location: Brazil

PostPosted: Sun, 25-Jan-2009 13:54    Post subject: Reply with quote

well, I always thought that anna does a promenade in the start of her clubs routine ...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Invisible Hedgehog



Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Posts: 1718
Location: Ukraine, Kyiv

PostPosted: Sun, 25-Jan-2009 14:34    Post subject: Reply with quote

yes, she did...what's the problem?
_________________
Ridentem dicere verum quid vetat
check - http://www.ukraine-rg.com !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
gabrielafs



Joined: 18 Oct 2008
Posts: 169
Location: Brazil

PostPosted: Sun, 25-Jan-2009 19:00    Post subject: Reply with quote

Invisible Hedgehog wrote:
yes, she did...what's the problem?


In fact, Is there any diference between Tour lent and promenade ??
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CoCoNuTsiopatHic



Joined: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 819

PostPosted: Sun, 25-Jan-2009 20:20    Post subject: Reply with quote

gabrielafs wrote:
Invisible Hedgehog wrote:
yes, she did...what's the problem?


In fact, Is there any diference between Tour lent and promenade ??


All promenades are tour lents, but not all tour lents are promenades.

All cognac is brandy, but not all brandy is cognac! Very Happy

"Tour lent" is French for 'slow turn", which are done in balances and flexibilities. When a slow turning flexibility is performed on flat foot, we typically call it a "promenade" whereas slow turning balances are referred to as "tour lents".
_________________
*Elegance is an attitude.*
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Tahnee
RSG.net Moderator
RSG.net Moderator


Joined: 11 Jan 2004
Posts: 3296
Location: Perth, Australia

PostPosted: Sun, 25-Jan-2009 23:21    Post subject: Reply with quote

gabrielafs wrote:
Invisible Hedgehog wrote:
yes, she did...what's the problem?


In fact, Is there any diference between Tour lent and promenade ??


To put it simply, tour lent is on toe, and promenade is on flat foot. Wink
_________________
http://www.youtube.com/Tahnee2612
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
elli



Joined: 30 Aug 2006
Posts: 165
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Mon, 26-Jan-2009 12:52    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
well, I always thought that anna does a promenade in the start of her clubs routine ...


Quote:
"Tour lent" is French for 'slow turn", which are done in balances and flexibilities. When a slow turning flexibility is performed on flat foot, we typically call it a "promenade" whereas slow turning balances are referred to as "tour lents".


well, then it isn*t a promenade, but a tour lent, anna does , because she does it on releve, doesn*t she?

I have a question to the tourlents (especially in cossack position) no matter if old or new code I think its the same, but : can I do less then 90° per impulse, so that I, for example if I perform it as E , so 180° total, do more than to impulses, f. ex. 4 impulse à 45°??
because I always saw it like that f. ex. here at 0: 54: :http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REgqlILMKGo&feature=related
at least to me it looks like shes doing 4 impulses Confused

But now I saw in the CoP that i only says NOT MORE than 1/4 turn per impulse.
so I can do more "impulses and less turn per impulse instead of just doing 2 impulses a 90°?
Do you understand my problem? Laughing
_________________
Congrats to Anya!!!YEAH!!!
>>>>>photo: thanks to www.barny-th.de
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Rhythmic Gymnastics Forum Index » Code of Points All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 1 of 7

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Contents | Information | Events and Results | Gymnasts | Archive

last Modified: 25. October 2003

Copyright © 1996-2004 Alexander Kochanntrilobit GmbH
trilobit